Come Together: The Role of Collaboration in Research, Writing, and Teaching

AHA Session 152
World History Association 4
Friday, January 8, 2027: 3:30 PM-5:00 PM
Napoleon Ballroom B2 (Sheraton New Orleans, 3rd Floor)
Chairs:
Candice Goucher, Washington State University, Vancouver
Suzanne Litrel, independent scholar
Panel:
Cara Delay, University of South Carolina, Columbia
Aldo Vladimir Garcia-Guevara, Worcester State University
Timothy Nicholson, Farmingdale State College, State University of New York
Tracey K. Rizzo, University of North Carolina at Asheville
Comment:
Kerry R. Ward, Rice University

Session Abstract

What are the mutual benefits and potential pitfalls of choosing to engage in academic collaboration? World historians, among others, often collaborate because our field spans multiple disciplines, regions, languages, archives, and historiographical traditions in ways that often exceed the capacity of any single scholar or single book. Discussants will consider the role of collaboration in historians’ professional development from graduate study through retirement as we apply for grants, jobs, tenure, and to conferences like the AHA. Some of us have chosen to collaborate with communities or in classrooms, others in publishing, including several of us who are contributing manuscripts to the same book series and have been working together for years. Along with audience members, we will exchange insights into what can happen when scholars write and think with, alongside, and in response to one another’s academic endeavors rather than in isolation.

Bringing together scholars working on different regions and periods, the roundtable explores how collaboration can be a learned skill and strategy that fosters innovation and excellence, creativity, intellectual rigor, and above all, joy. Shared writing across long book projects can reshape the very formation of research questions, narrative scale, and interpretive frameworks. Instead of beginning from a solitary project that is later placed into conversation with others, we also consider what it means to write and think from the outset in awareness of parallel projects, shared themes, and overlapping concerns. In this approach, reading early draft chapters, providing feedback on manuscripts, and developing sustained dialogue become part of the intellectual infrastructure of writing world history.

A particular focus of the discussion is the role of gender in the intellectual process of intentional, collaborative exchange. When scholars read and comment on one another’s drafts, they often identify gendered assumptions, silences, or patterns that may not be visible within a single regional or temporal frame. Writing in conversation allows historians to notice how gendered food production, labor systems, kinship structures, legal regimes, or political authority recur across contexts, prompting revisions to provide a better focus on thematic aspects of gender in world history as manuscripts develop.

The roundtable also considers how a collaborative writing process shapes prose, narrative choices, and evidentiary strategies. Writing for world history requires constant decisions about scale, comparison, and voice: when to zoom in, when to generalize, when to foreground particular actors, and how to represent difference without flattening it. Working across distinct projects encourages authors to be more explicit about these choices, as feedback from collaborators reveals how readers from other fields, regions, or methodological traditions encounter the text.

By focusing on how individual academic endeavors can become collaborations in dialogue with one another, the discussion will explore collaboration as an integral part of the craft of world history, as learned skill and strategy. Collaboration can shape arguments, and produce richer, more self-aware accounts of the past in addition to encouraging and maintaining focus, energy, and devotion to research, writing, and teaching projects at all stages of our careers.

See more of: AHA Sessions