In this paper, I situate British debates over amelioration in French revolutionary politics of 1790s – both in the metropole and in the Caribbean - , and explore two paradoxes that emerge out of the British perspective of presumed French successes and failures: first, a strain of British discourse that described French planters as 'superior' (notwithstanding the radical overturning of slavery with the 1794 emancipation proclamation); and second, the opposition of French reactionary planters to the Amis des noirs in French amelioration debates before and after the proclamation. I argue that the central contradiction of French and British planters' views of how slavery had to evolve in order to preserve its roots are found in repeated subsistence crises going back to the slave plantation complex's origins: the awareness that slavery could only be stabilized and sustained through attention to food provisioning and the effective administration of transatlantic trades in foodstuffs, although committing the resources needed for provisioning in this manner was almost entirely antithetical to the policies and practices of colonial planters and metropolitan authorities alike.
See more of: AHA Sessions