Yet, the records of feminist groups, professional associations, and contemporary publications reveal that working women disagreed over the terms and value of sexual harassment law. Many wondered whether a litigious, adversarial approach was the best way to either end harassment or advocate for themselves. Struggles over sexual harassment did not unfold in the terms of sex equality and difference that have preoccupied scholars; rather, invested parties debated how to create the most material benefit for working women. This paper argues that high profile court cases and growing employer concerns about liability, rather than a united struggle among working women, cemented today’s definition of sexual harassment as any unwanted attention to a worker’s sex or gender. Further, today’s conception of women’s workplace rights as the downplaying of sex and sexuality has compounded the difficulty of discussing the ongoing disadvantages facing women due to their differences—whether real or perceived, biological or culturally assigned—from men.
See more of: AHA Sessions