This paper challenges that view, suggesting that profit-seeking and price-making markets were an unintentional byproduct of expanding communal debt, not the reason for its existence. It puts fourteenth-century sources like account books and notarial records into conversation with poetry and theological treatises. This examination shows that, although price-making markets for financial instruments did exist, Genoa’s long-term debts were actually sustained by patrimonial property logics and cultural expectations about gender, wealth, and family. It suggests that practices of financial speculation (making money from money, trading in pieces of paper) must be placed in a cultural and historical context to be properly understood. The paper argues, most broadly, for a history of finance in which quantitative and cultural analyses are mutually-informing.
See more of: New Directions in Medieval Economic History
See more of: AHA Sessions