I argue that early nineteenth-century Florida was a coastal frontier region, home to several competing claims to sovereignty and differing cultural frameworks for understanding and utilizing the peninsula’s lands and waters. My work analyzes the ways that the legal pluralism and environmental realities of the Florida frontier prevented effective enforcement of anti-slave trading laws while simultaneously creating a space of freedom for those enslaved people who could escape to it and survive its harsh environmental conditions. Illegal slave traders utilized Florida’s position at the southern border with the U.S. to continue importing slaves to that country throughout the 1810’s despite its abolition of the trade in 1808. The same swampy, dangerous environment that helped enable the Seminoles and free Blacks to maintain their freedom helped prevent the U.S. Navy from effectively regulating the slave trade and piracy in Florida. Ultimately, I argue that the unique confluence of legal and environmental factors in early nineteenth-century Florida resulted in a paradoxical frontier region which both facilitated the illegal slave trade and provided a safe haven from slavery until the American conquest of Florida in 1821 led to the forcible closing of that frontier.
See more of: AHA Sessions