This paper studies the relationship between Jerusalem’s Persian Jews and the Qajar state through the prism of legal belonging. As emigrees, how did they relate to the Qajar state? What benefits did Qajar subjecthood offer them, in comparison to other forms of legal belonging, such as Ottoman subjecthood? From the state’s perspective, what was the political significance of Jerusalem’s Persian-Jewish community? And what was at stake in its enduring ties to the Qajar state?
Extra-territoriality shines a particular light on subjecthood and citizenship. These questions are therefore relevant for understanding the position of Jews in 19th-century Iran. Moreover, the daily practice of consul-subject relations matters in exploring overlapping patterns of governance between the Ottoman and Qajar empires. As the paper will argue, the Qajar state sought to govern its subjects in Jerusalem, through taxation and other forms of coercion. Yet, despite these disadvantages, Persian Jews maintained ties to the Qajar state, enjoying benefits that other Jerusalemites eventually coveted as well.
See more of: AHA Sessions