The “Han Dynasty” Counterrevolutionary Rebellion and Agricultural Collectivization in Anhui, 1955–57

Friday, January 8, 2027: 3:30 PM
Grand Ballroom B (Sheraton New Orleans)
Yixin Chen, University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Using the Han Dynasty rebellion of 1955–1957 as a case study, this paper examines how tensions between the socialist state and rural society produced the first wave of active peasant counterrevolutionary groups in the early People’s Republic of China—a phenomenon that remains underexplored. Following the intensive suppression of “past counterrevolutionaries” between 1950 and 1955, largely those linked to the defeated Nationalist regime, organized political opposition in the countryside appeared to have been eliminated. Yet the implementation of new socialist policies—most notably the Unified Purchase and Sale system from December 1953 and agricultural collectivization beginning in October 1955—reshaped everyday state–peasant relations and generated widespread rural resentment.

Originating in 1955 as a sectarian fantasy centered on a peasant’s aspiration to become emperor, the Han Dynasty expanded by April 1, 1957 to include more than thirty peasants whose grievances stemmed primarily from grain procurement policies and labor management under collectivization. Conflicts between villagers and production brigade cadres over work assessments and resource allocation further intensified these tensions. The resulting uprising, which unfolded in a remote border area of three Anhui counties, lasted only one day and led to the deaths of three policemen and two rebels. In its aftermath, local authorities arrested seventy-five suspects, executed fourteen of the seventeen sentenced to death, and imposed long prison terms on ten others.

This paper argues that dynastic symbolism functioned less as an ideological alternative to Communist rule than as a socially legible framework through which peasants articulated grievances and mobilized against local manifestations of state power. The rebellion thus reveals how coercive policy enforcement and everyday conflicts at the grassroots level transformed state–society frictions into violent confrontation, even in the absence of an explicit challenge to the Communist regime.

Previous Presentation | Next Presentation >>