Adams County includes approximately 158 SCC claimants, of whom about twenty-seven percent were women. This project draws on the full Adams County SCC corpus while focusing analysis on women’s claims, based on a working subset of approximately 30 to 40 case files. SCC case files are particularly useful for relational analysis as they often preserve testimony that names family members, neighbors, employers, and witnesses, including formerly enslaved individuals. These testimonies record relational information that is often fragmented or less visible in other postwar archival collections.
The poster presents findings from claimant-centered relational analysis, which combines close reading of testimony with structured extraction of named relationships. Analysis of these cases indicates that women’s claims document overlapping networks of kinship, household labor, and community affiliation that extend across multiple households and social circles. Network visualizations highlight recurring witness clusters, cross-household connections, and labor and neighborhood ties, illuminating patterns of community trust and cooperation. These networks also make visible the presence of formerly enslaved individuals as identifiable social actors whose relationships may be documented primarily through testimony rather than through formal records.
By foregrounding women’s cases as sites where postwar social worlds become legible through relational evidence, this project demonstrates how the Southern Claims Commission can be read as a relational archive rather than solely as a bureaucratic compensation record. The poster combines relational typologies, network visualizations, and descriptive measures to show how testimony links claimants and witnesses across kinship, labor, and neighborhood ties, while recovering individuals and relationships that often remain fragmented or obscured in conventional archival collections. In doing so, the project emphasizes the recovery of gendered and marginalized voices embedded in claims testimony, including formerly enslaved people as identifiable social actors whose lives and connections may be documented most clearly through witness networks. Although grounded in a single county, the case study offers a scalable interpretive framework for reconstructing community formation and examining how gender shaped postwar claims-making, credibility, and belonging during Reconstruction.