Existing literature on the Danish abolition decision has explained it either as motivated by humanitarian sentiments, or as a calculated response to guard Danish imperials interests, in expectance of the large-scale reconfiguration of the Atlantic Slave Trade system that was expected to follow a British abolition.
Existing scholarship on this landmark decision has framed it either as a humanitarian gesture or as a strategic move to safeguard Danish imperial interests in anticipation of a broader restructuring of the Atlantic slave trade, particularly in response to a potential British abolition.
While this paper does not reject these interpretations outright, it shifts the focus beyond the immediate deliberations of the commission that recommended abolition to explore the broader context of Danish overseas trade in the 1780s and early 1790s. In the years leading up to the slave trade ban, Danish authorities dismantled long-standing trade monopolies in Iceland and Finnmark and debated ending the Greenland trade monopoly. At the same time, they pursued extensive agrarian reforms at home. These policies reflected a new political-economic paradigm centered on free trade and free labor, which contrasted sharply with the natural-knowledge-based economic thinking that had previously dominated imperial governance. Thus, I argue that to fully understand Denmark’s slave trade abolition we must situate it within these shifts in economic thought, as well as the geopolitical realities facing Atlantic Empires after the end of the American War of Independence in 1783.
See more of: AHA Sessions