This paper examines the historian’s role when historical knowledge is not merely erased but rendered ineffective in the face of ongoing violence. Situating Palestine’s present within a longue durée framework, I explore how archival fragments, material traces, and oral histories function as methods for writing histories that remain politically and ethically engaged. But can such analyses remain grounded when the ground itself is layered with the crushed bodies of the dead? Drawing from conversations with Indigenous scholars, I reflect on the historian’s role as an intimate outsider amid deepening exclusion. I argue that historical methodologies must account for the material and political conditions under which knowledge is produced and mobilized, particularly when that knowledge is confronted with the physical obliteration of landscapes, communities, and the very archives that document them.
By placing Palestinian history in conversation with Indigenous struggles across Latin America, North America, and Australasia, this paper considers how historical analysis can respond to dispossession and destruction without reinscribing the logics of loss that settler colonialism depends upon.
See more of: AHA Sessions