The association of curry with India and Indians helped dietary reformers resolve a potential inconsistency. But by 1832 most people in the U.S. no longer connected curry with the nation of its origin. By 1832, curry was common enough that many cookbooks contained “American” recipes for the spice and its utilization. Graham (and other dietary reformers’) association of curry with India would stick, though. Over the course of the 19th century, U.S. consumers would increasingly see curry as a foreign spice. By the late nineteenth century, it was marketed in cookbooks and restaurants as “exotic.” Though the vegetarian movement was not successful in many ways, it was strangely successful in changing consumers’ perceptions of curry.
This paper traces perceptions of curry among U.S. dietary reformers, arguing that they effectively re-exoticized and re-racialized curry to suit their needs. Curry’s history thus represents an interesting reversal of the typical food narrative of introduction and assimilation - it was unassimilated. Its story is illustrative because curry was, instead, an edible point of reference for navigating race, imperialism, and cultural contact in an age of increasing globalization.
See more of: AHA Sessions