Proponents of ascriptive republicanism addressed these contradictions in several ways. They downplayed or ignored the contributions of women and Black men to America's wars, minimized the historical ineffectiveness of the militia system, and cultivated the myth of the virtuous white citizen-soldier. They also developed tropes to reconcile the presence of armed women and African-Americans with their ideology.
This paper focuses on women—white and Black—and arms. First, historical records show that women of both races have always been present in American wars, with some even carrying firearms as an exercise in republican political membership. Second, ascriptive republican ideology developed the concept of "republican mothers and wives" for white women, positively differentiating them from other categories of people who couldn't be citizen-soldiers while reinforcing their subordination to white men. Third, since this worldview was incompatible with women bearing guns to exercise political rights, dominant narratives either portrayed them as defenders of the private domain or, in cases like female soldiers or spies, rejected their femininity altogether.
Like Black civil rights movements, women's rights movements tried to employ inclusive republican arguments based on women's war service to support political membership. However, such attempts were unsuccessful because they ran counter to dominant ascriptive republican myths of citizenship that associated political membership with white manhood.
See more of: An Armed Nation versus a Disarmed Continent? Gun Culture and Gun Control in the USA and Europe
See more of: AHA Sessions