Session Abstract
This is the second of a two-part panel that aims to foster a wide-ranging discussion around mentorship philosophies, practices, and prospects for the future. In the first session, an open forum, graduate students and early career scholars shared their experiences and perspectives on mentorship: what it means, what's working, what's lacking, and how mentorship needs might differ across demographics and career trajectories. After some key issues were identified, participants broke into small groups to dig deeper into particular issues and brainstorm ideas for addressing mentorship gaps.
This second session will bring a diverse array of voices into the conversation, including faculty at different career stages, graduate students, institutional staff, as well as insights from the latest mentorship research. How can we distinguish between advising vs. mentoring? Can or should mentorship be centered on the whole person rather than just academic outputs? What inclusive mentoring models can better serve scholars across intersectional identities? What role can peer and community mentoring play? What professional development is needed to train effective mentors and advisors? By creating a forum to openly discuss mentorship's past, present, and future, we hope to raise critical awareness, share effective practices, and spur new thinking on this vital issue impacting all historians in a diversifying discipline. We invite undergraduate students considering graduate study to also attend and engage with these conversations.