Conference on Latin American History 10
Session Abstract
The papers on this panel analyze these themes of national belonging and citizenship across the Americas and Caribbean, challenging assumptions about the United States as the hemispheric ideal of republicanism and integration of foreigners. During the independence wars in Chile and Peru, as analyzed by Sarah Chambers, nationalists regarded residents who had been born in Spain with suspicion unless they explicitly embraced the liberation movements and labeled compatriots who remained loyal to the Crown as “denaturalized.” Once independence was achieved however, the new government sought reconciliation and welcomed back wealthy émigrés. In striking contrast to later naturalization laws, Spanish men could naturalize through their marriage to local women and their fathering of future citizens. Almost one hundred years later, the Spanish custom of naturalization through local integration was still operative in Cuba during the transition from colony-through protectorate-to republic at the turn of the 20th century. Dalia Muller explores how Cuban statesmen created a specific naturalization clause to address the case of recently-emancipated, African-born people who could not qualify for birthright citizenship. As the Spanish empire shrank, US imperialism expanded. Sam Erman traces how US borders moved over people, incorporating African Americans, New Mexican Hispanos, American Indians, Puerto Ricans and Samoans into the nation. These groups experienced diminished and foreclosed sovereignties without gaining full citizenship rights.