The Civil War of Desegregation: The Use of Civil War Memory in 20th-Century School Integration Efforts

AHA Session 236
Sunday, January 5, 2025: 1:30 PM-3:00 PM
Bowery (Sheraton New York, Lower Level)
Chair:
Caroline E. Janney, University of Virginia
Comment:
Barbara A. Gannon, University of Central Florida

Session Abstract

In 2021, the school board of San Francisco, California voted to rename 44 schools that it considered honored people with discriminatory legacies. Around the same time, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed legislation to ban the teaching of critical race theory in public schools, including discussions of the realities of American slavery and the Civil War. Book bans evoked considerable pushback from educators and students around the nation. Yet the controversies over school names, Confederate symbols in education, and textbooks are not merely a recent phenomenon. This panel explores the deeper history of these debates, particularly in the mid-20th century. Our collection of papers examines the ways in which activists and institutions used the memory of the Civil War to fight for- or against the integration of public schools and the teaching of Black history. This panel grapples with several questions: How was the Civil War used by activists as a rhetorical tool during the long Civil Rights Movement? Why were debates over the Civil War important within the sphere of education at this time? What do these debates within education reveal about the longevity of and uses of Civil War memory? These histories reveal the longer historical stakes at play in current debates over the teaching of the history of slavery and the Civil War, as well as the resistance against neo-Lost Cause interpretations of the War.

Through methodologically diverse investigations based within, and pushing against the boundaries, of disciplines including History, Material and Visual Culture Studies, History of Education, and American studies, these papers confront these questions. Meredith Barber frames Virginia’s history classrooms as a key site of conflict during Brown v. Board and massive resistance. She positions the work of the Virginia History and Government Textbook Commission (1948-1965) in conversation with the pedagogy of Black teachers to argue that the teachers intentionally shaped their portrayals of the Civil War as a challenge to the Lost Cause, pro-segregation textbooks that were mandated by the state government. Anne Boyd explores how the United Daughters of the Confederacy entered into a new period of intense political activism as a reaction to the Brown v. Board Supreme Court decision. She argues that the Daughters drew explicit connections between contemporary white supremacist opposition to school desegregation, the Lost Cause mythology, and the naming of schools after Confederate leaders. Ashleigh Lawrence explores Black student protest against Lost Cause symbolism in the decades after school integration and argues that the tension over retaining or dismissing these symbols revealed the fraught and incomplete nature of school desegregation. Ultimately, each paper provides a different answer to the question of how Civil War memory and countermemory remained a battleground during the process of integration and desegregation. The answers will be better understood through the dialogue created between them.

See more of: AHA Sessions