Until then, identification and biometrics had been confined to obscure police stations and prisons. However, the elections coincided with a rapid modernization of the state and the introduction of new devices such as identity cards. For the purposes of the 1931 election, the newly created National Jury of Elections designed a special portable card that contained the most salient biometric features: fingerprints, personal information, a photograph, and signature. This paper examines how this juncture favored the transition from a technological expertise aimed to register suspects and potential criminals into a crucial instrument of citizenship and expansion of democracy such as the libreta electoral.
Focusing on the 1931 presidential election — and drawing from various kinds of archives and primary sources—, I study the strategies and mechanisms displayed by individual and mass political parties to provide voting cards for their members and potential voters in Lima and elsewhere. The abrupt introduction of photos and the possession of a personal document were two major innovations that defined the rest of the century, characterized by a tension between those who were able to obtain an identity card and those who were excluded as non-citizens based on racial and social criteria.
See more of: AHA Sessions