The Historian as Writer and Storyteller, Part 1: The Historian as Writer and Storyteller, Part 1

AHA Session 177
Saturday, January 7, 2023: 10:30 AM-12:00 PM
Grand Ballroom Salon L (Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, 5th Floor)
Chair:
Surekha Davies, Utrecht University
Panel:
Kendra T. Field, Tufts University
Carrie Gibson, independent scholar
Amy B. Stanley, Northwestern University
Tamara J. Walker, Barnard College, Columbia University

Session Abstract

This pair of linked roundtables is organized around the conviction that historians are both writers and storytellers. Too often, the demands of academic publishing foreground other considerations, such as demonstrating erudition and participating in scholarly debates likely familiar to the intended readership. Publishing with popular presses and trade-lists thus holds much appeal as venues for books with compelling narratives that are intended for broader, less specialized audiences. Yet we need not think in terms of either/or - of either argumentation or vivid narration. These conversations will feature scholars who are working on or have published narrative histories in trade-lists of both commercial and academic presses. Our goal is to explore the challenges of balancing disciplinary concerns about evidence and argumentation with artistic and literary concerns about narrative framing, discuss approaches to developing our craft as writers and storytellers, and consider the value and stakes of transcending or reimagining established genre conventions.

Roundtable 1: The historian as storyteller needs to unsettle academic orthodoxies, not only to connect with broader audiences but also to access a wider range of truths. In this first session, speakers will reflect on pervasive (popular) myths about history and history-writing, and discuss how creative nonfiction helps to dismantle these myths. It allows scholars both access to new forms and genres of storytelling as well as insights and sources typically excluded by the profession, such as those of personal experience and memory.

Questions asked will include: how do imagined audiences shape the imperatives that guide our work, and inform decisions about additional glossing needed concerning people and subjects that have not traditionally been deemed to merit coverage in historical works? How can we effectively balance general audiences’ points of departure with the need to introduce them to new kinds of historical actors, perspectives, and arguments? When writing about marginalized figures and themes, how might scholars balance giving audiences what they currently expect or want to read about with what they need but may not consider to be important or relevant to understanding the past? What role can creative nonfiction play in shifting public norms about fixed boulders of history - about what counts as important events, and whose lives are deemed to constitute history?