Anticommunism, Right-Wing Politics, and Latin America’s Cold War

AHA Session 37
Conference on Latin American History 6
Thursday, January 5, 2023: 3:30 PM-5:00 PM
Grand Ballroom Salon K (Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, 5th Floor)
Chair:
Jaime Pensado, University of Notre Dame
Comment:
Aaron Coy Moulton, Stephen F. Austin State University

Session Abstract

In recent years, Latin Americanist historiography has contributed to enriching the study of the global Cold War. Following the multi-national collaborative agenda shaped by scholars like Odd Arne Westad, Gilbert Joseph, Greg Grandin, Daniela Spenser, Vanni Pettina, and many others, Latin America’s Cold War experience has been tackled from approaches that favor transnational and cross-regional dynamics, reminding us as well of the importance of locality and of the intersections between nationalisms and internationalisms. Works on Latin America’s role in the Third World project, or on the expansive networks built by leftist activists and intellectuals, for instance, have shed light on Latin Americans’ active participation in capitalizing on, contesting, and shaping the contest between superpowers ( the “Cold War proper”). Equally important is the call to “de-center” the United States from Latin American Cold War histories, which, without dismissing the US’s presence and hegemonic project, have also revealed the extent of Latin America’s engagement with the rest of the world.

The study of Latin American right-wing politics during this period continues to receive less attention, much to the detriment of the need to paint fuller pictures of Latin America’s Cold War experience. Besides addressing this deficit, the papers featured in this panel contribute to broadening the discussion of “the international,” “the global,” and “the transnational” in Latin Americanist Cold War scholarship. From the Argentine military concern’s for Catholic subversion (Johnson); the actions of hardline right-wing Cuban exiles in Puerto Rico (Chase); the historical narrative of the Chilean military junta and their outlook on the late Cold War (Avery); to the conflictive “grassroots diplomacy” of Mexican anticommunists (Herrán Ávila), these papers intervene in an important and necessary conversation about the impact and traction of anticommunism and conservatism in the region’s history. Altogether, the papers showcase the broad range of actors involved in imagining and enacting forms of repressive or counterrevolutionary violence, justified by ideas of “the enemy” that were both broad enough (e.g. “international communism”) to be linked to reigning Cold War anxieties, and specific enough (leftist Catholic priests, Puerto Rican political activists, “moderate” right-wingers) to justify the branding and targeting of concrete individuals and organizations as traitors, accomplices, criminals, terrorists, or overall threats to the nation. They also highlight the need for new and more expansive analyses of Cold War right wing politics at the state and grassroots levels, and their intersections with nationalism and internationalism in the realms of ideology, diplomacy, and forms of political action animated by notions of a war, struggle, or even “resistance” against communism. Lastly, the papers offer a wide geographical span, dealing not just with nation-bounded actors (e.g. the Chilean and Argentine military) but also with the transnational “spill-over” effect that anticommunist crusades entailed throughout the Southern Cone, North and Central America, the Caribbean, and beyond.

See more of: AHA Sessions