Love, Sex, and Marriage in the 20th-Century United States

AHA Session 204
Saturday, January 8, 2022: 1:30 PM-3:00 PM
Rhythms Ballroom 2 (Sheraton New Orleans, 2nd Floor)
Chair:
Alison Lefkovitz, Rutgers University–Newark and New Jersey Institute of Technology
Comment:
Alison Lefkovitz, Rutgers University–Newark and New Jersey Institute of Technology

Session Abstract

Historians have revealed the centrality of marriage and sex to the U.S. political economy. Extant historical scholarship, however, has only begun to explain the political and social meaning of marriage, or more broadly romantic encounters, and its relationship to the construction of race, gender, nation, and citizenship in the twentieth century. This panel considers romantic relationships as tools for defining, claiming, and performing citizenship and belonging, constructing visible and lasting divisions in a diverse society, and shaping and institutionalizing race and gender arrangements. In short, this panel argues that the politics of marriage and sex are, in fact, the politics of race, sex, and gender. Focusing on the twentieth-century, this panel asks: Does marriage in itself imply certain rights of citizenship or confer social belonging? What was the federal government’s role in marriage-making throughout the twentieth century? How did intimacy (interracial, intraracial, heterosexual, and homosexual) shape Americans’ responses to government interventions into their private lives? And how did love, sex, and marriage inform the nature and direction of the Civil Rights and Women’s Liberation Movements?

These questions are taken up in four papers that discuss love, sex, and marriage in colonial projects, on the battlegrounds of the black freedom and feminist movements, and even in the U.S. military. William Kuby examines “Tom Thumb Weddings,” or simulated marriage ceremonies performed by juveniles in the early twentieth century. These “weddings” encouraged early enthusiasm for marriage and procreation, particularly among white middle-class children who, in the eyes of eugenicists, held the potential to halt the nation’s descent into “race suicide” if given the proper training. Emily Swafford will discuss the U.S. military’s regulation of marriage—and by extension, love and sex—in the early Cold War era. She reveals that, while the military had long regulated sex and marriage, mostly by discouraging marriage and providing outlets for male, heterosexual sex, the armed forces began encouraging marriage and family after the Second World War. Traci Parker examines African American women’s romances in the 1950s and 1960s. She argues that, because gender, sexuality, and Jim Crow were intricately intertwined in deeply pathological ways, romantic relationships were sites where racism and gender inequalities were confronted in the Civil Rights Movement. Sarah Rowley concludes this panel. In her presentation, Rowley investigates how the election of married women to the U.S. Congress in the 1970s incited public debates on the state of marriage. These congresswomen ran on independent, professional records and sparked discourse concerning gender roles, family, the breadwinner economic model, and masculinity in crisis. Together, these papers interrogate the intersections between the private and public realms to consider how personal romantic relationships have been bound up with larger questions of social and political power.

See more of: AHA Sessions