Saturday, January 4, 2020: 11:10 AM
Flatiron (Sheraton New York)
By the early 1980s the popular perception of São Paulo as an ethnically-immigrant, nonblack metropolis had achieved an unparalleled material reality. In the preceding decade, local business owners had partnered with municipal officials to remake two center-city neighborhoods, Liberdade and Bexiga, into recognizably “Japanese” and “Italian” places. Their projects to transform the local built environment included cherry blossom lanterns, Samurai-themed sidewalks, and lampposts shrouded in the Italian flag. Most locals explain the racialized/ethnicized identities of these places (long categorized in academic literature as “ethnic enclaves”) by pointing to the settlement of immigrants and their descendants. At no point in the twentieth century, however, did Italian- or Japanese-descendants constitute a majority of these neighborhoods’ populations. Through the mid-twentieth century, in fact, Liberdade and Bexiga had exceptionally-high concentrations of nonwhite populations and uniquely-sacred spaces linked to slavery, abolition, and black self-determination. An ambitious mid-century redevelopment project centered on asphalted avenues literally and figuratively paved the way for the remaking of Liberdade and Bexiga as material spaces and racialized/ethnicized place-based identities.
In this
See more of: Planning, Difference, and Dislocation in the Black Americas: Atlanta, Port-au-Prince, and São Paulo
See more of: AHA Sessions
See more of: AHA Sessions
<< Previous Presentation
|
Next Presentation