The absence of formal legal protections did not mean that colonial and early national women failed to exercise religious agency. Despite St. Paul’s oft-repeated injunction to “[l]et your women keep silence in the churches,” women occasionally signed church covenants and religious petitions, as well as serving as lay leaders and informal preachers during evangelical revivals. We also know that orthodox clergymen regarded women as especially susceptible to irregular beliefs and practices and especially prone to ensnaring their husbands in the same heretical webs. In other words, there were many reasons for the nation's constitutional framers to have taken cognizance of women when they framed provisions for
Revisiting pivotal episodes in American religious, constitutional, and women’s history (including Anne Hutchinson’s antinomianism, female revivalism during the Great Awakening, and the reformation of divorce law) this paper will describe patterns of female dissent and its treatment over time, as well as the significance of its exclusion from contemporary and scholarly commentary on both the establishment of religion and its free exercise.