Saturday, January 4, 2020: 2:10 PM
Central Park West (Sheraton New York)
Every historical narrative is by its nature an act of re-telling, an interpretive reiteration of that which had already been uttered or recorded. Moving away from the mere idea of history as myth in the sense so often associated with the concept of “invented traditions,” this paper attempts to think more broadly about the parallels between the meaning-making role of mythology and the narrative work of history. First, the paper unfolds as a critical survey of the appearance of the figure of Medusa in a range of nineteenth and twentieth century texts and images—from the works of Sigmund Freud, to the Sicilian flag, to the Versace logo. In exploring the historical conditions surrounding the “Medusa’s” recurrence in diverse and indeed global contexts, the paper suggests that we might find a fertile parallel for rethinking how historians first excavate and then re-narrate the past. This is a particularly useful exercise precisely if we are to fully interrogate how and to what extent contemporary political narrative arcs, tropes, and metaphors influence historians’ relationship to the “ sources" and the stories that they set out to retell. Finally, the paper concludes by suggesting that the recurrence and reinterpretation of specifically mythological metaphors provides a non-linear and much longer term modality for reconsidering the historian’s concern with “continuity” and “rupture."
See more of: New Horizons of Historical Thinking in an Age of Contested Narratives
See more of: AHA Sessions
See more of: AHA Sessions