This paper takes up these questions by examining the history of the Santiago Metro during the 1980s. It argues that the Metro’s history in this period illuminates the conflict between two competing models of development. On the one hand, the subway was based on the premise that state intervention could rationalize the city and harmonize different modes of transit. This view was supported by the Metro’s French funders and advisers, as well as its Chilean planners and architects. On the other hand, the neoliberal model pushed by the Pinochet dictatorship (1973–1989) promoted increased competition and a limited role for the state in all sectors of the economy. Although this conflict hindered the Metro in the 1980s, the vision for a rational city remained alive and would reemerge after Chile’s transition to democracy. This study shows that the shift from state-led developmentalism to neoliberalism was contested by both Chilean and French actors and argues that urban development was a key arena for these struggles.
See more of: AHA Sessions