Yet, according to Blavatsky, colonial rule reduced this pure Sikh body from its former heights. This descent was symbolized most convincingly in deposed and exiled Maharaja Duleep Singh, who, Blavatsky argued, though the son of the famed Maharaja Ranjit Singh, succumbed to the allures of a decadent Europe. Against Duleep Singh, Blavatsky highlighted, what she termed, the “feeble” body of Duleep Singh's mother, Maharani Jind Kaur. Jind Kaur, Blavatsky posited, had to reject a sacred form of grieving located within sati [widow-burning] in order to fight for the lost Sikh Empire. For Blavatsky, Jind Kaur's “feeble body” functioned as a receptacle to embody the ghostly resurrection of Ranjit Singh and redeem the debased Sikh body politic. Through Jind Kaur’s body, Blavatsky constructed a ‘legitimate’ anti-colonial politics, defying and upholding colonial narratives of race as well as rescue and reform associated with women in the colony. Therefore, though Theosophical renderings reveal the power of colonial rule and its attempt to continuously manage bodies, the Theosophical Society also demonstrates how the body refused such conscription, remaining open to numerous articulations.
See more of: AHA Sessions