Irrigation projects in the region were used to settle internal peripheries around static politicized sites, a form of spatial management that dispossessed any community that failed to satisfy the specific social structure prioritized by the state. The control of water resources contributed to a hierarchy of belonging and citizenship that benefited only those willing to acquiesce, deliberately excluding the livelihoods of transhumant and pastoral communities such as the Orma and the Somali. These groups relied upon riverine landscapes and boreholes to water their cattle yet were denied access on the basis of what the state perceived to be a destructive social and agricultural practice, redefining who water belonged to and the types of societies that could benefit from it. This paper shows how mobile communities came to be treated as second-class subjects, demonstrating the ways that the politics of water and the politics of interiority/exteriority were used in the process of colonial state formation.
See more of: World History Association
See more of: Affiliated Society Sessions