This paper challenges the historical assumption that Díaz’s long-term governors were mere puppets of the national regime by explaining how and why Cahuantzi’s regime began to decline. It explores how pro-government supporters responded to anti-reelectionists’ demands by analyzing debates between newspapers both for and against Díaz and Cahuantzi’s respective regimes, as well as a collection of electoral broadsides in the Tlaxcalan state archive. These broadsides featured hundreds of citizens’ signatures meant to corroborate support for the governor during the 1904 and 1909 state elections. The existence of these broadsides—which, even if forged, required significant effort to compose—begs the questions: why did the state government insist on the illusion of democratic elections? Further, was it possible to denounce a stalwart Porfirian crony while concurrently supporting Díaz? Opposition to Cahuantzi, especially among elites, did not always signify alliance with the broader anti-reelection movement. Though revolutionary fervor was strong in Tlaxcala-Puebla, differences in anti-reelectionists’ ideologies and interests would eventually impede the development of a unified revolutionary coalition in the region. The paper thus debates whether peoples’ support or rejection of the national regime was necessarily shaped by their relationships with regional power brokers.
See more of: Conference on Latin American History
See more of: Affiliated Society Sessions