The centerpiece of the poster is a set of stunningly detailed drawings rendered by local Berlin architects, as well as the call for bids, and conflicting wage tables issued by both the Airport Authority, using pre-war figures, and the U.S. Military Command in Zehlendorf, which sought to normalize higher wages across the U.S. and British occupied zones. Contrasted with the ruinous state of Berlin’s built and social infrastructure, the precise architectural renderings reveal a latent yet strong professional sector eager to begin rebuilding the devastated city while also capitalizing on new opportunities of a destroyed city.
While Carolyn Eisenberg has argued that the occupation of Berlin and the division of Germany was the result of a convergence of conservative, anti-Communist U.S. interests, a close reading of the documents surrounding the Officer’s Club, including U.S. Army Command communications, Berlin Airport Authority memos, as well as the architectural renderings, wage labor records, and individual reports from airport administrators reveal a much more complicated story of competing agendas, miscommunication, and shifting levels of agency. Evidence suggests that there was never a monolithic U.S. military politic that set the agenda for Berlin, or Germany. There were, rather, subsets of people – Germans, Allies, Soviets – with specific affiliations, interests, and ideals for the future.