Drawing on European, Japanese, and Chinese sexology, and medical research, commentators analyzed Tao’s mental and physical state to diagnose why she had transitioned from healthy short-term same-sex love, an endemic feature of single-sex educational institutions that prepared one for heterosexual love and marriage, to morbid long-term same-sex love and then murder. Some identified neurasthenia, or glands and secretions. Others accentuated insanity, the result of congenital brain defects. Still others blamed willfulness and malice. A few apologists celebrated the women’s love and faulted societal stigma for the killing. These etiologies of Tao’s lesbian and murderous impulses variously assigned or excused her culpability, pointing to modernity, society, female physiology, and disease as possible causes. In addition to determining whether Tao should be subject to the death penalty, these theories highlighted the ease with which love in the modern age could “go wrong,” leading to same-sex love and murder.
See more of: AHA Sessions