The erasures range from the mortuary monuments of private individuals, where enemies may have erased their names and images to deny them an afterlife, to the names of rulers, whose names and images were suppressed when they became viewed as somehow illegitimate or perhaps where the preservation of their memory might have led to problems for the legitimacy of subsequent kings. In some cases, the erasures and replacements with the names of other kings may have simply been viewed as updates. There were also a wide variety of ways in which such erasures might be achieved, including replacement, chiseling out of hieroglyphs that left the texts and scenes largely legible, and complete obliteration. Occasionally, erased images and texts were later replaced.
The monumental temple constructions of Hatshepsut, a queen regnant (circa 1477-1456 BCE) offer examples of several different types of erasures, which when viewed in the context of other examples, illuminate the Egyptians’ ideas about the nature of images and the value of memory and monumentality. Questions explored will include the violence and destructiveness of the erasures, the degree to which the erasures effectively hide or destroy the monuments, and the problems posed by differential methods of erasure within the same monument. The strategies the Egyptians employed in dealing with their sometimes problematic history may offer us suggestions for dealing with our own.
See more of: AHA Sessions