A Utopia for Captive Labor: Seabrook Farms and Paroled Japanese American Internees

Saturday, January 7, 2017: 11:10 AM
Centennial Ballroom H (Hyatt Regency Denver)
Andrew T Urban, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
In his paper, Andy Urban examines Seabrook Farms, a company town and frozen-foods

agribusiness in southern New Jersey that presented itself as a utopia and site of social

rehabilitation for Japanese Americans and immigrants (Nisei and Issei) stripped of civil liberties

and incarcerated in internment camps. C.F. Seabrook, the company's founder and chief

executive, contracted Issei and Nisei as part of a supervised parole program, and hired them as

agricultural laborers at below market wage rates. Between 1943 and 1945, Seabrook hired more

than 2,500 released internees, making it the single largest recipient of parolees who passed the

government-issued “loyalty questionnaire” and qualified for work release. Seabrook marketed

his town as a safe place where the company’s control over all aspects of community and

economic life – as landlord, organizer of public education, and social and health services

provider – ensured that Nisei and Issei families would be protected from discrimination and

harassment that made many hesitant to pursue parole.

Urban’s paper focuses on how World War II-era liberalism, and the efforts of “sympathetic”

whites such as Seabrook to provide safe spaces for Issei and Nisei detainees denied rights,

encompassed multiple agendas. This paper seeks to challenge the existing hagiography of

Seabrook Farms as a utopic bastion of pluralism effectively sealed off from racism. Examining

the extensive collection of official company photographs documenting work and social life at

Seabrook, and oral histories produced by grown Nisei children relocated to New Jersey, Urban

approaches these archival sources as midcentury liberal propaganda. By understanding how this

intentional community intersected with wartime labor demand and the alleviation of worker

scarcities that were the biggest impediment to capitalist growth in this period, Urban’s paper

unpacks how liberal social projects were also projects of political economy.