Agency, Mobility, and Materiality in a Trans-Andean 19th Century
My paper argues that in attempting to standardize record-keeping practices during the Andino line’s construction, state engineers encountered defiance from the materials that engineers sought to capture in proposals, contracts, and progress reports. Such defiance was not merely the result of materials’ intrinsic properties. Rather, material defiance of record-keeping practices was the result of the different ways of relating materials. Divergent ways of relating materials came from many sources, from different temporal frames represented by planning, executing, and evaluating the project, to the tensions among different bureaucratic and engineering practices. Ultimately, I suggest that the materiality of the state reveals the fragmented and incoherent nature of liberal-state formation. At the same time, I gesture toward the ways that transnational capital took advantage of this disjointed process of state ‘building.’ When the Argentine state sold the line to a private firm, this firm re-sold it at a significant profit and used those profits to push forward the construction of a bi-national railroad between Chile and Argentina.
See more of: AHA Sessions