Western Promises: Abbas Hilmi II’s Maryut Railway Project and Territoriality in Egypt, 1892–1914
In this paper, I examine the political valences of the Khedive’s railway project. I argue that the Maryut Railway ultimately serves to complicate our understanding of territoriality at a moment in which the political geography of the Egyptian nation-state was still fundamentally uneven. Historians typically define territoriality as a set of norms that governed how modern states sought to control bordered political space under their sovereignty. What I feel is missing in much of this literature, however, is an effort to expand the conception of territoriality in the crucially formative pre-WWI period to include alternate territorial sensibilities—to investigate how multiple notions of territoriality competed, overlapped, and transformed one another.
The Maryut Railway project serves as a crucial example of how the construction of a railroad (often held as the quintessential nineteenth-century metaphor for the expansion of state power) did not necessarily serve the territorial interests of the centralizing state. Instead, I argue, the Maryut Railway functioned as one of several projects through which the Khedive sought to open up the Egyptian West in his capacity as a sort of “quasi-state actor,” whose modernizing vision for the region belies any easy dichotomy between public and private space. In the process of building the railway, the Egyptian West was transformed into a more personalized territorial realm that the Khedive seemed to cultivate in competition with the state apparatus in Cairo.
See more of: AHA Sessions