Failing in Every Endeavour to Conciliate: Governer Arthur’s Proclamation Boards to the Aborigines, Transnational Connections, and Postcolonial Afterlife

Sunday, January 10, 2016: 8:50 AM
Room 303 (Hilton Atlanta)
Penny Edmonds, School of Humanities, University of Tasmania
Failing in every endeavour to conciliate’’: Governor Arthur’s Proclamation Boards to the Aborigines, transnational connections and postcolonial afterlife

 In 1829 Lieutenant Governor George Arthur issued a series of Proclamation Boards illustrated with images of friendship, equality before the law and mutual punishment for Aborigines and Europeans alike, in an attempt to conciliate Aboriginal people in Van Diemen’s Land (Tasmania). These striking images have been reworked over time, and have come to shape understandings of Australian history at national and international levels. Yet for images so regularly cited in history books they have been under researched and frequently detached from the interconnected global and imperial histories that produced them. In line with new work that seeks to trace the political and cultural networks of empire, this paper considers the boards in transnational context. Proposing that the boards be considered objects of diplomacy, the paper examines the transference of iconography, including the humanitarian handshake, found on treaty medals and British anti-slavery tokens between networked British colonies. Reflecting on the visual lexicon of imperialism and broader discourses of the management of Indigenous peoples and slaves in British colonies and former colonies, the paper reveals how these political objects promoting peace and conciliation were often distributed in ritual gesture within a climate of Indigenous dispossession of their lands, frontier conflict and war. Lastly, the paper considers the works of Aboriginal artists Gordon Bennett and Julie Gough. These artists’ interventions may be understood as creative postcolonial counter-mappings that both remember and subvert established narratives of colonisation and conciliation, but also as expressions that provoke new conversations about history, heritage, and the past in the present, especially within a new yet nevertheless troubled paradigm of reconciliation.