The Fifth Column: Foreign Muslims, Extraterritoriality, and the Autonomy of the Ottoman Hijaz
European powers controlled much of the legal and regulatory framework of the rapidly industrializing pilgrimage transportation industry. However, their ability to monitor and regulate the hajj did not extend past the port city of Jidda. European powers accepted that their Christian consuls were forbidden from entering Mecca and Medina. Nevertheless, they sought to provide consular protection for their colonial subjects by appointing Muslim agents or vice-consuls to act on their behalf. In response, the Ottoman Empire claimed that due to the Hijaz’s sacred status the province was not subject to the Capitulations or other legal concessions. Yet, as this paper argues, by claiming that the Capitulations and other internationally binding treaties did not apply to the Hijaz, the Ottoman state further exposed the compromised nature of its sovereignty over the Muslim holy places, raising the specter of European intervention and partition at the heart of the Islamic world.
See more of: AHA Sessions