Babies Having Babies: The National Epidemic of Teenage Pregnancy and the Case for Federal Intervention
But why were Congress and the Carter Administration so convinced that teenage pregnancy was a matter of national importance? In this paper, I argue that the teenage mother was such a compelling figure because she represented both present and potential tragedies. The teenage mother could symbolize the lost innocence of a child – a baby having a baby – but she could also be the forerunner of the dreaded “welfare queen,” forever dependent on the state. In this sense, the “in-between” age of the teenage mother created a doubly compelling justification for federal intervention. While both symbols were loaded with race and class connotations, they were deployed interchangeably in state documents to garner support for the cause. Carter’s legislation was less concerned with pregnancy prevention than with the support of teenage mothers in hopes that the state could mitigate both the immediate and potential consequences of adolescent childbearing, including unemployment, welfare dependency, and poor health outcomes. It wasn’t until the passage of the Reagan-era Adolescent Family Life Act in 1981 that the focus of the OAPP shifted from support of teenage mothers to the regulation of adolescent sexuality, deploying a moral – as opposed to a humanitarian or economic – justification for federal intervention.
See more of: AHA Sessions