The Intent and Application of the 1838 Ottoman Maritime Quarantine Reform
Nevertheless, maritime quarantine frequently had an economic function as well as a medical one. Indeed, Ottoman reformers saw the quarantine as an effective pretext for the state to control and tax imports and exports. This brought them into occasional conflict with the same European powers who ostensibly instigated Ottoman reforms. In particular, Hamdan Bin El-Merhum Osman Hoca (1773-1840), advocated for quarantine by arguing that it could protect the Empire's sovereignty by more efficiently regulating its trade. Hamdan’s insistence that the quarantine remain under Ottoman control would frustrate those foreign powers who sought to use outbreaks of disease in the Empire as a justification for greater influence in the region.
Once established, Ottoman quarantine faced substantial criticism from both French and British anticontagionists. These critics suggested that medical conditions could only improve with better local administration and that quarantine was ineffective. Though such anticontagionist figures are often cast within the European tradition as reformers and liberals, this paper will demonstrate that the Ottoman officials who opposed them in major conferences of the late nineteenth century were among the leading reformists in the Empire (including the seasoned diplomat Turhan Paşa and the renowned intellectual and quarantine official Ahmed Midhat).