Families, Fraud, and Foreclosure: Mortgage Law and Women’s Property in the Eighteenth Century
Most scholars have ignored these kinds of persisting tensions, wrongly assuming that the structure of mortgage settlements, and factors determining foreclosure, had been resolved in Chancery by the end of the seventeenth century. In fact the scope and implementation of mortgage doctrine was left unresolved, and mortgage became a focus for debate about the wider problem of debt, and the worrisome potential for fraud, in this period of economic growth and volatility. This paper will present evidence of such debate from an eighteenth-century treatise literature, as well as from exemplary case law. And it will focus on evidence indicating that typical complaints regarding unfair advantage, fraud and deceit were frequently at the center of disputes not only between creditors and debtors, but also between wives and husbands, mothers and sons. A focus on some of these complaints and problems will not only provide a better understanding of the history of mortgage doctrine, but it will also open up important questions about the extent and security of English women’s property in this period.
See more of: AHA Sessions