Since its inception as an academic discipline, oral history has aimed to record the voices of people on the margins. It remains useful for drawing connections between the impact of empire on marginalized groups across different sites. For instance, what points of commonality were there between the social conditions and cultural lives of American Indians on the Oklahoma plains and Aboriginal Australians during the mid-twentieth century? How might students contextualize these interviews in order to articulate the social and political forces that distinguished the Indigenous experience in these regions?
Equally compelling are the intersections between oral history and memory studies, which provide a platform for interrogating what empire meant – and continues to mean – to individuals who were invested in sustaining imperial rule or in opposing it. Having students explore the personal narratives of low-level participants in the Indian independence movement or the Vietnam War can open up discussions of how anti-colonial nationalism was conceptualized “on the ground,” and how it was refracted through other forms of collective belonging, like gender or religion. Located at the ever-shifting divide between history and memory, past and present, oral history remains a fascinating, if underused, source on the complexities of the imperial experience.
See more of: AHA Sessions