A prevailing trope in environmental history has been how domestic animals aided human invaders in suppressing indigenous societies. The history of African reactions to the horse – even in this circumscribed telling – perhaps demonstrates a less imperialist side to ‘invasive’ species, or at least presents a much more complicated and shifting picture. Looking to imperial history and its ecological disruptions and focusing explicitly on the material contexts of the violence (both physical and figurative) that is connected to horses must not blind one to their role in resistance. This paper will argue that horses served to represent an early attempt at symbolic and intellectual resistance to the colonial metropole. With the undeniable military advantage they lent the emerging state that allowed it to take on encroaching neighbouring powers, including imperial Britain, leads one to ask: Was the horse not merely an instrument of ecological imperialism, as Crosby suggests, but also an instrument of resistance?
See more of: AHA Sessions