I will argue that the NCCW’s response to Vatican II was positive, at least initially. These women tentatively embraced church renewal, and most intriguingly, linked it to a mild form of women’s rights talk. This finding is certainly surprising; the NCCW was not considered to be a feminist organization, certainly not by Catholic feminists or by anyone else for that matter. It was housed in and funded by the American Catholic hierarchy and was singled out by many a frustrated feminist for its negative stand on the Equal Rights Amendment and abortion rights.
This raises several key questions: how did the NCCW define for itself the renewal process that would drastically reshape its membership’s experience of the sacred? How did their conception of themselves as women influence their positions? The papers of the NCCW make clear that assumptions about how conservative Catholic women might have responded are inadequate. Their reactions changed over time and were very complex, richly so, showing a group of women who do not fit standard definitions. Though viewed by the left as old-fashioned, fuddy-duddy obstructionists in pill-box hats, the NCCW proved quite interested, if not whole-heartedly committed, to renewal and women’s rights. Their approaches to both movements complicate our understanding of each.
See more of: AHA Sessions