This paper describes how the Code reconfigured filiation according to the liberal logic of contract, in which kin ties between parents and extramarital progeny shifted from a sacred, natural relationship to a voluntary, contractual one. The contractualization of kinship granted fathers unfettered freedom to recognize or reject illegitimate offspring. And it created a taxonomy of filiation categories associated with differential rights for illegitimate people themselves.
Meanwhile, in giving rise to compulsory and complex new administrative procedures for recognizing (and legitimating) extramarital children, this legal reform engendered the bureaucratization of filiation. Yet the enhancement of the state’s bureaucratic authority is only part of the story, for in carving out new and inalienable paternal rights to freedom, privacy, and personal conscience, the Code ultimately empowered men at the expense not only of women and children but of the courts themselves.
See more of: AHA Sessions