In November 1941, when Kharkiv fell to the Germans, Liubchenko started keeping a diary. For the next three and a half years he rarely let a day pass without writing several pages. In the process he produced a remarkable account of life under occupation.
Liubchenko, who at first welcomed the Wehrmacht as a liberator, became disillusioned with German aims in the East. But he never shook off his belief that Jews were to blame for every conceivable ill, and his diary contains anti-Semitic outpourings of astonishing virulence. When a portion of the diary appeared in the West in 1951, critics mentioned the anti-Semitism only in passing. A fuller edition that was published in
Long puzzled by the discordance between the raging against Jews in the diary and the seeming absence of an anti-Jewish animus in Liubchenko’s stories, I set about reading the two parts of his corpus and studying his extensive archive. Drawing on psychoanalytic concepts and applying structuralist techniques, I will argue in my paper that the structure of the thinking that underlies Liubchenko’s diary and stories is identical. In the face of the hated Jew he saw his own features.