Sunday, January 4, 2009: 9:00 AM
Beekman Parlor (Hilton New York)
This paper suggests that both similarities and differences between Chinese and European states in the twentieth century can be better understood by considering the relevance of “empire” to understanding the challenges faced and capacities developed by states in China and Europe in the preceding thousand years. The kinds of fiscal policies taken in a commercialized agrarian empire are starkly different from those elaborated in among far smaller states actively seeking to strengthen themselves domestically and to compete with each other. Neither Chinese nor European trajectories of state transformation are “typical” of the world more generally; instead they represent two different and successful political paths into the twentieth century.
See more of: Globalizing the Historiography of State Formation—Comparing Trajectories of State Formation: The Role of Values, Sociopolitical Institutions, and Demographic-Ecological Conditions
See more of: AHA Sessions
See more of: AHA Sessions
Previous Presentation
|
Next Presentation >>