One of the central themes recently considered is the influence of fear, either real or imagined, on the behavior of both prosecutor and victim. Historians would often prefer to believe that individuals are motivated toward a positive destination, the guerrilla gives ample evidence that those who lived on the margins of society, particularly in a contested border region, were frequently motivated by a need to avoid individual or collective harm. Numerous examples exist illustrating the frenetic social climate that thrived in the topographically isolated communities of the Appalachian region. In this environment of often-dubious sentiment, proactive violence became a popular undertaking, particularly during times of increased unrest. One guerrilla justified his proactive behavior as “taking time by the forelock” claiming that his frequently unarmed enemies would have killed him if he had not done so first. The pragmatism that resulted from this unrelenting fear drove families to strategically divide and substantial portions of communities to relocate in an attempt to assure themselves of immediate and future security. While it is relatively easy to dismiss guerrillas as mindless thugs bent on simple destruction, the alternative suggests that the turmoil of the ever-present conflict helped drive these participants toward their eventual fates and helped them along their violent paths.
See more of: AHA Sessions